The built in types of C are not useful enough on their own as they vary between compilers. For example a long is 32 bits on Windows, but 64 bits on OSX. This makes using them in function prototypes problematic if word size is important. A lot of libraries define their own types, but again I don’t want to have this dependency. Fortunately there are some standard .h files that come with most C compilers now. C99 defines several standard files, one is stdint.h. This file defines data types such as uint32_t, which specifies an exact type. Microsoft’s C compilers are not C99 compliant, however they do include a subset. Fortunately they do include stdint.h. Which means I can use those without any problems on Windows. Both Linux and OSX (and probably most other gcc compilers) have stdint.h as well.

While stdint.h provides most of the base types that I want to use, there is one obvious one that is missing. C itself does not define a boolean type, but C99 defines stdbool.h which has the type bool and the value true and false. These are very basic types that I wish were built directly into the compiler. Unfortunately MS C does not come with stdbool.h. Even though its only a couple of lines in length. I’ve seen arguments on the Internet about whether a boolean type is required or useful. Some people think not, but I personally like them. Although the type is nothing special, its in fact just an int or a char probably, the usage of the type is different from a regular integer. Having an explicit type makes code clearer what its use is. For example if I have a function that returns a success that can only have two states (success, or not success), then having the return type a bool is far more clear than having the return an int. If its an int I’m going to wonder what possible values it could return are, maybe it returns different error codes. With a bool return type I can see that it simply returns a true/false state.

Because MSVC doesn’t contain stdbool.h I resisted using it initially with these projects. But I have decided its just too useful to ignore. So I have extended my build environment to have my own version of stdbool.h which is only used on Windows builds. Most of the core library cryptographic functions won’t use bool anyway, but some of the other projects will. This does mean there is one slight dependency when working in Windows, and thats the stdbool.h file I’ve added. It will be very easy for anyone to remove that dependency though. Simply replace bool with int, false with 0, true with 1, and remove #include <stdbool.h>. This could even be done with a very simple script.

The contents of my stdbool.h file are as follows:

#ifndef _STDBOOL_H_
#define _STDBOOL_H_

#ifndef __cplusplus
#ifndef __bool_true_false_are_defined

typedef int     bool;
#define true    1
#define false   0

#define __bool_true_false_are_defined

#endif //__bool_true_false_are_defined
#endif //__cplusplus

#endif //_STDBOOL_H_

The __bool_true_false_are_defined definition is part of the C99 standard. So I check that and don’t redefine if its already set. Additionally I make a check that its not C++ because C++ natively has bool, false, and true.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s